Juniper tried to refocus as Sophia handed out copies of the latest statistical analysis. “These figures highlight the disproportionate impact on specific communities. It strengthens our claim of systemic issues.”

James studied the papers, nodding approvingly. “Good. Let’s ensure our arguments are airtight. Judge Donahue is known for his analytical approach. He’ll expect us to address both substantive and procedural aspects thoroughly.”

Daniel leaned forward again, studying the papers with that same intensity she’d just witnessed. “This data is compelling,” he said, his voice low and thoughtful. “It paints a vivid picture of the systemic issues at play.” He paused, tapping his finger on the table. “But we can’t just present numbers. We need to weave them into a narrative that directly supports our legal arguments.”

His eyes found hers again. Juniper took a stabilizing breath, adjusting her position in her seat… hip turned slightly out, knees pressed together… squashing the sudden awareness of if she was catching tide or not. Definitely not.

…”What was the number again? umm… US 10,236,621 B2… yes,” she recited silently.

“I suggest we look into using Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly as a precedent,” Daniel said. “It could strengthen our position significantly.”

Juniper felt a flicker of uncertainty, the case name unfamiliar… quick

“Absolutely,” she agreed, hoping her tone conveyed confidence. Twombly? I’ll have to look that up later. She made a mental note, determined not to be seen as caught with her pants down.

“We can integrate this data seamlessly into our arguments on commonality and typicality,” she continued, pushing through her uncertainty. “By showing how the experiences of our class representative reflect the broader patterns we’ve uncovered, we’ll paint a compelling picture that the court can’t ignore.”

Relief washed through her, mixed with somethingharder to dismiss. Stop analyzing whether you need his expertise. You don’t need anyone. But her racing pulse suggested otherwise, and that annoyed her more than his unexpected competence.

Daniel nodded, his attention back on the documents. The moment broken. “Also, we should consider including expert affidavits to support our statistical claims.”

Back to business then. “Sophia is coordinating with experts in constitutional law and statistics,” Juniper informed him. “We should have their affidavits by the end of the day.”

“Good,” Daniel replied. “Their input will add significant weight to our brief.""

Previous
Next