Juniper responded with precision. “Certainly, Your Honor. While United States v. Juisys LLC addressed specific executive actions, our case deals with a broader pattern of selective prosecution based on origin, which is directly protected under the Equal Protection Clause.”

Turning to Roma, the judge asked, “Mr. Roma, how do you reconcile the principles established in United States v. Juisys LLC with the need to address systemic discrimination in prosecutorial practices?”

“The principles in United States v. Juisys LLC provide a necessary framework to balance national security with individual rights,” Roma replied smoothly. “However, our case does fall within those specific security concerns, and thus, the established precedent does not support the plaintiffs’ claims.”

Judge Donahue watched Roma closely, noting his confidence and the slight cockiness in his demeanor. Internally, he acknowledged Roma’s legal expertise and grit, even as he sensed the undercurrents of arrogance in his approach.

As the hearing progressed, Roma attempted to dismantle the defense’s statistical evidence. “Again, Your Honor… the data presented by the defense appears to be selectively chosen,” he began, his voice carrying a hint of condescension directed at the bench, though his eyes never left Juniper. Then his tone sharpened, turning fully toward her as if the judge had vanished entirely. “Can the defense explain the methodology behind these statistics? Because I don’t wanna have to ask again.”