Sophia stood by her bench, ready to provide any additional documentation or evidence if called upon. The room watched as the defense team meticulously laid out their case, each point reinforcing their position. Juniper’s presentation was clear and persuasive, designed to leave no doubt in the minds of those present.

When it was time for the DOJ’s rebuttal, Alexander Roma rose once more, his demeanor unshaken. “Your Honor, the defense’s methodology is questionable,” he began, challenging the credibility of their evidence. “The data presented appears to be selectively chosen to support their narrative.”

The judge turned to Juniper. “Ms. Valenca, can you explain the methodology behind these statistics?”

Juniper responded promptly. “Certainly, Your Honor. Our data was sourced from independent studies conducted by reputable institutions, ensuring impartiality and accuracy in reflecting prosecutorial patterns.” Daniel stepped in, addressing the procedural aspects with clarity. “Furthermore, the class was certified based on Rule 23 requirements, with each member’s claims being typical and representative of the broader group affected by these discriminatory practices.”

Roma smirked slightly, his confidence unwavering. “I call it like I see it Your Honor, these numbers don’t paint the full picture of discriminatory practices.” His voice carried a note of derision, attempting to undermine their statistical evidence.