“Public interest,” he continued, his voice taking on that particular resonance that made even the most jaded observers lean forward, “isn’t just a legal term. It’s the foundation upon which our society builds its future.” His hands sketched shapes in the air with surgical precision. “When we speak of algorithms making critical decisions, we’re not just talking about code – we’re talking about the dignity of human choice.”

At the plaintiff’s table, Juniper felt her chest tighten. This wasn’t Roma’s usual stagecraft and strings. This was something far more dangerous – passion tempered by genuine expertise.

Alexander Roma’s voice carried through the courtroom with a resonance that seemed to vibrate in the very bones of those present. His words, tempered by the fire of personal conviction, painted a picture of a future both awe-inspiring and deeply unsettling.

“Ladies and gentlemen,” he continued, his tone carrying the weight of a man who had seen the future and returned bearing uncomfortable truths, “the Department of Justice stands before you today not just as an enforcer of the law, but as a guardian of the very principles upon which our society is built.”

He moved with the precision of a surgeon, each step deliberate, each gesture chosen for maximum impact. “Under the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 874, we recognize the grave consequences of wrongful interference with contracts. In United States v. Juisys LLC, the court established that public interest must be a paramount consideration in cases involving critical decision-making processes.”